Argh! Another blame shifter. The problem is NOT speed. The
problem is people ignoring the traffic rules. A car ignoring a red light is
still going to crash into you at 50 km/h.
A car that hits a cyclist at 50 km/h
can still kill the cyclist since it is rarely the impact with the car the
causes death, but the way and area in which the cyclist falls.
run in front of a car will still be hit by said car. The damage may be less
with a slower speed, but that will still depend on whether the driver was
paying attention to the road and doesn't end up dragging the child.
Read the original story here
on, but HOW are they planning on stopping taxis from jumping red lights,
pretending stop streets are only for other motorists. Why is it that in the
countries where speed is either not limited or not as severely limited, there
isn't more death? There are in fact less accidents and death.
Oh and hang on, while I'm ranting, what about this passenger seatbelt rule? On
my favourite topic of taxi road-hogs, this would then technically mean that all
passengers in a taxi need to wear safety belts. So no more overloading ... ok
that can work.
But I tell you what, you get all taxis to just obey the rules of the road, and
all the passengers to wear seat belts and only one seatbelt to a passenger,
then I'll slow down. Deal?
Share your views on the proposed bill in our Readers Comments below or e-mail us and you could have your thoughts published on Wheels24.