AN END TO DRIVER ERROR? Autonomous cars might be the solution to ending crashes, such as the one pictured here, caused by driver error. Image: Shutterstock
SINGAPORE - As millions of cars are under recall for potentially lethal air bags, designers are trying to reduce the need for the device - using sensors, radar, cameras and lasers to prevent collisions in the first place.
With driver error blamed for over 90% of road crashes, the thinking is it would be better to have them do less of the driving.
The US Insurance Institute for Highway Safety found that forward-collision warning systems cut vehicle-to-vehicle crashes by 7% - not a huge leap,but a potential life saver. Nearly 31 000 people died in car crashes in the USA in 2012.
Thomas Weber, global R&D head at Mercedes-Benz, said: "Passive safety features will stay important, and we need them. The next level is now visible. Autonomous driving for us is clearly a strategy to realise our vision for accident-free driving."
While giving a computer full control of a car is some way off, there's a lot it can do in the meantime.
For now, in some cars you can take your foot off the pedal and hands off the wheel in slow-moving traffic, and the car will keep pace with the vehicle in front; it can jolt you awake if it senses you're nodding off; alert you if you're crossing into another lane; and brake automatically if you don't react to warnings of a hazard ahead.
How close this all comes to leaving the driver out of the equation was illustrated by an experiment at Daimler in 2013: adding just a few off-the-shelf components to a Mercedes-Benz S-Class, a team went on a 100km ride in Germany without human intervention.
Team member David Pfeiffer said: "The project was about showing how far you can go, not just with fancy lasers, but with stuff you can buy off the shelf."
Such features, however, require solving thorny problems, including how to avoid pedestrians.
While in-car cameras are good at identifying and classifying objects, they don't work so well in fog or at night. Radar, on the other hand, can calculate the speed, distance and direction of objects, and works well in limited light, but can't tell between a pedestrian and a pole. While traffic signs are stationary and similar in shape, people are often neither.
For a better fix on direction there's LiDAR - a combination of light and radar - which creates a picture of objects using lasers. Velodyne's sensors on Google's autonomous car, for example, use up to 64 laser beams spinning 20 times per second to create a 360-degree, 3D view of up to several hundred metres around the car.
Mercedes' 'Stop-and-Go Pilot' feature matches the speed of the car in front in slow traffic and adjusts steering to stay in lane using two ultrasonic detectors, five cameras and six radar sensors. "This technology is a first major step," said R&D chief Weber. "(However distracted the driver is), the system mitigates any accident risk in front."
The next stage, experts say, is a road network which talks to cars, and where cars talk to other cars. General Motors has said its 2017 Cadillac CTS will transmit and receive location, direction and speed data with oncoming vehicles via a version of Wi-Fi.
Other approaches include using cameras to monitor the driver. Abdelaziz Khiat, at Nissan Motor's research centre in Japan, uses cameras to track the driver's face to detect yawns, a drooping head suggesting drowsiness, or frowns that may indicate the onset of road rage.
These advanced safety features are fine - if you can afford them. The Insurance Institute survey found that the forward collision warning systems were available in fewer than one in every 20 registered vehicles in 2012.
In key markets across emerging Asia, says Klaus Landhaeusser, regional head of government relations at Bosch , many first-time car buyers don't want to spend more than the equivalent of R28 000. For that, he said, "you won't be able to introduce any safety features."
Road conditions are also key.
Henrik Kaar, of auto safety equipment market leader Autoliv Inc, said: "It will be a long time before we have software and algorithms that can see everything happening."
And not everyone welcomes this progress. Some drivers complain the technology is intrusive, or is inconsistent.
Chris Hayes, a vice president at insurer Travelers, said: "If a safety feature is seen as intrusive or bothersome, a driver may try to circumvent or disable it."
The key appears to be ensuring that while humans remain in charge of the vehicle, they have good information and features that correct the errors they make.
Michael James, senior research scientist at Toyota US technical centre, said: "For a long time, people thought it was an all-or-nothing jump between humans in charge and fully autonomous vehicles. I don't think that's the case anymore. People see it as a more gradual transition."